How do Jason Robertson and Kyle Connor compare? Last season Robertson put up 96 points to Connor's 92, with 5v5 expected-goals shares of 54.5% and 49.9%. See the full stat-by-stat breakdown below, or open the interactive Compare tool for in-depth stats, goal maps, and career trajectories.
| 82 | Games played | 82 |
| 45 | Goals | 39 |
| 51 | Assists | 53 |
| 96 | Points | 92 |
| 1.17 | Points per game | 1.12 |
| 20.3 | Ice time / game (min) | 21.5 |
| 2.24 | 5v5 points / 60 | 2.46 |
| 54.5% | xGF% (5v5) | 49.9% |
| 37.4 | Individual xG | 32.6 |
| +7.6 | Finishing (G - xG) | +6.4 |
| 104 | 2026-27 projected points | 88 |
Robertson was the more productive scorer in 2025-26, outpointing Connor by just 4 (96 to 92). Robertson posted a 45-51-96 line at 1.17 points per game, while Connor went 39-53-92 at 1.12. At 5-on-5 they diverge on impact: Robertson tilted the ice with a 54.5% expected-goals share to 49.9% for Connor. Robertson was the sharper finisher, scoring +7.6 goals relative to expected next to +6.4 for Connor. For 2026-27, HighDanger's model projects Robertson at 104 points, ahead of Connor at 88. On balance, Robertson grades as the stronger pick heading into 2026-27, though the table above and the interactive tool let you weigh the categories that matter most to you.
Free forever. No credit card.
Make a Free Account and gain
Stats from the 2025-26 NHL season plus HighDanger metrics and 2026-27 projections. The better value in each row is highlighted. Full interactive charts and trends are in the Compare tool.