How do Nick Suzuki and Jack Eichel compare? Last season Suzuki put up 101 points to Eichel's 90, with 5v5 expected-goals shares of 52.2% and 60.7%. See the full stat-by-stat breakdown below, or open the interactive Compare tool for in-depth stats, goal maps, and career trajectories.
| 82 | Games played | 74 |
| 29 | Goals | 27 |
| 72 | Assists | 63 |
| 101 | Points | 90 |
| 1.23 | Points per game | 1.22 |
| 20.8 | Ice time / game (min) | 21.2 |
| 2.24 | 5v5 points / 60 | 2.61 |
| 52.2% | xGF% (5v5) | 60.7% |
| 30.6 | Individual xG | 27.4 |
| -1.6 | Finishing (G - xG) | -0.4 |
| 92 | 2026-27 projected points | 93 |
Suzuki was the more productive scorer in 2025-26, outpointing Eichel by 11 (101 to 90). Suzuki posted a 29-72-101 line at 1.23 points per game, while Eichel went 27-63-90 at 1.22. At 5-on-5 they diverge on impact: Eichel tilted the ice with a 60.7% expected-goals share to 52.2% for Suzuki. Eichel was the sharper finisher, scoring -0.4 goals relative to expected next to -1.6 for Suzuki. For 2026-27, HighDanger's model projects Eichel at 93 points, ahead of Suzuki at 92. On balance, Eichel grades as the stronger pick heading into 2026-27, though the table above and the interactive tool let you weigh the categories that matter most to you.
Stats from the 2025-26 NHL season plus HighDanger metrics and 2026-27 projections. The better value in each row is highlighted. Full interactive charts and trends are in the Compare tool.