How do Connor McDavid and Martin Necas compare? Last season McDavid put up 138 points to Necas's 100, with 5v5 expected-goals shares of 56.9% and 56.7%. See the full stat-by-stat breakdown below, or open the interactive Compare tool for in-depth stats, goal maps, and career trajectories.
| 82 | Games played | 78 |
| 48 | Goals | 38 |
| 90 | Assists | 62 |
| 138 | Points | 100 |
| 1.68 | Points per game | 1.28 |
| 23.0 | Ice time / game (min) | 21.5 |
| 2.46 | 5v5 points / 60 | 2.88 |
| 56.9% | xGF% (5v5) | 56.7% |
| 45.1 | Individual xG | 25.9 |
| +2.9 | Finishing (G - xG) | +12.1 |
| 136 | 2026-27 projected points | 92 |
McDavid was the more productive scorer in 2025-26, outpointing Necas by 38 (138 to 100). McDavid posted a 48-90-138 line at 1.68 points per game, while Necas went 38-62-100 at 1.28. At 5-on-5 they diverge on impact: McDavid tilted the ice with a 56.9% expected-goals share to 56.7% for Necas. Necas was the sharper finisher, scoring +12.1 goals relative to expected next to +2.9 for McDavid. For 2026-27, HighDanger's model projects McDavid at 136 points, ahead of Necas at 92. On balance, McDavid grades as the stronger pick heading into 2026-27, though the table above and the interactive tool let you weigh the categories that matter most to you.
Free forever. No credit card.
Make a Free Account and gain
Stats from the 2025-26 NHL season plus HighDanger metrics and 2026-27 projections. The better value in each row is highlighted. Full interactive charts and trends are in the Compare tool.