Nick Suzuki vs Auston Matthews: Stats, xG & 2026-27 Projection
How do Nick Suzuki and Auston Matthews compare? Last season Suzuki put up 101 points to Matthews's 53, with 5v5 expected-goals shares of 53.4% and 48.5%. See the full stat-by-stat breakdown below, or open the interactive Compare tool for in-depth stats, goal maps, and career trajectories.
| 82 | Games played | 60 |
| 29 | Goals | 27 |
| 72 | Assists | 26 |
| 101 | Points | 53 |
| 1.23 | Points per game | 0.88 |
| 20.8 | Ice time / game (min) | 20.8 |
| 2.24 | 5v5 points / 60 | 1.96 |
| 53.4% | xGF% (5v5) | 48.5% |
| 29.2 | Individual xG | 29.9 |
| -0.2 | Finishing (G - xG) | -2.9 |
| 103 | 2026-27 projected points | 83 |
How they compare
Suzuki was the more productive scorer in 2025-26, outpointing Matthews by 48 (101 to 53). Suzuki posted a 29-72-101 line at 1.23 points per game, while Matthews went 27-26-53 at 0.88. At 5-on-5 they diverge on impact: Suzuki tilted the ice with a 53.4% expected-goals share to 48.5% for Matthews. Suzuki was the sharper finisher, scoring -0.2 goals relative to expected next to -2.9 for Matthews. For 2026-27, HighDanger's model projects Suzuki at 103 points, ahead of Matthews at 83. On balance, Suzuki grades as the stronger pick heading into 2026-27, though the table above and the interactive tool let you weigh the categories that matter most to you.
Free forever. No credit card.
Make a Free Account and gain
- AI Access
- Fantasy Team Roster Tracked
- Waiver Wire Grader
- Fantasy Team Analytics
- Mock Draft Head-to-Head
- Floor, Ceiling and Health
- Player Watchlist
- Trade Center and Comparisons
Stats from the 2025-26 NHL season plus HighDanger metrics and 2026-27 projections. The better value in each row is highlighted. Full interactive charts and trends are in the Compare tool.